Позитивные изменения. Том 2, № 3 (2022). Positive changes. Volume 2, Issue 3 (2022) - Гладких Наталья Юрьевна страница 13.

Шрифт
Фон

DO WE (NOT) NEED IT?

Large businesses and the non-profit sector are actively using assessment and have had notable success in doing so. This is dictated primarily by the need to publish regular public reports and meet performance standards.

The published reports on the impact of business and NGOs are of sufficient volume already to allow numerous studies and competitions. For example, the best NGO annual reports are selected annually as part of the Point of Reference competition of the Donors Forum, and the Institute for Emerging Market Studies at the Skolkovo Business School released the Gold Standard of impact assessment in 2021 a collection of cases and practices for measuring the social and environmental impact of business.

When it comes to business, there are a large number of methodological approaches that can be used to assess various aspects of its social impact. It is worth noting the four main methods that have the highest potential for application in the corporate context: Theory of Change, the Business for Societal Impact (B4SI) model, formerly known as the London Benchmarking Group, the Social Return on Investment (SROI) model, and the Impact Management Project.

The situation is different in the sector of social entrepreneurship: only a small proportion of entrepreneurs are engaged in assessing the social effect of their activities. First, because existing approaches to impact assessment in the business community are too complex and resource-intensive for social entrepreneurs, and there is no universal assessment standard for their business. Second, few SE leaders see the point and benefit of this action. More often than not, social business grows from the enthusiasm of its founders, who build it up against all odds, using their own resources and blazing with the desire to commit good. The purpose of such a business is to address a specific social problem. This begs the question: Why measure anything at all? The business somehow works, the problem is somehow solved. The team is focused on addressing operational tasks, and has no time or resources for analysis and refection.

Примечания

1

Фонд «Навстречу переменам» с 2012 года помогает развивать проекты социальных (импакт) предпринимателей, которые направлены на улучшение качества жизни детей и молодежи по всей России.

2

Отчет о социальном воздействии 20202021. Режим доступа: https://fond-navstrechu.ru/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/otchet-01.06.pdf (дата доступа: 27.09.2022)

3

Прочитать про проекты, которые поддерживает фонд «Навстречу переменам» и про их социальное воздействие, можно на сайте https://fond-navstrechu.ru/category/blog/.

4

Since 2012, Reach for Change has been helping develop projects by social (impact) entrepreneurs, which are aimed at improving the quality of life of children and youth throughout Russia.

5

Social Impact Report 20202021. Retrieved from: https://fond-navstrechu.ru/wp-content/uploads/2022/06/otchet-01.06.pdf (accessed: 27.09.2022). (In Russian).

6

To read about the projects supported by the Reach for Change Foundation and their social impact, visit https://fond-navstrechu.ru/category/blog/.

7

Социальное предпринимательство в России: перспективы развития (2021). Аналитический отчет по результатам опроса экспертов. Москва: ЦИРКОН, Social Business Group. Режим доступа: http://www.zircon.ru/upload/iblock/a9b/sotsialnoe-predprinimatelstvo-v-rossii-perspektivy-razvitiya.pdf (дата доступа 23.09.2022)

8

ТАСС (2022) Около 40 % опрошенных соцпредпринимателей заняты поиском инвестиций в кризис. Режим доступа: https://tass.ru/ekonomika/14592497 (дата доступа: 23.09.2022).

9

Annie E. Casey Foundation (2022) Developing a theory of change practical theory of change guidance, templates and examples. Retrieved from: https://www.aecf.org/resources/theory-of-change (accessed: 23.09.2022).

10

Everland (2022) Годовой отчет 21 о работе инклюзивного социального предпринимательского проекта Everland. Режим доступа: http://evland.tilda.ws/evotchet21/report21#rec455768011 (дата доступа: 23.09.2022).

11

Светлый город (2022) О нас.

Режим доступа: https://svetlyjgorod.ru/o-nas/ (дата доступа: 23.09.2022).

12

BuySocial.ru (2022) Режим доступа: https://buysocial.ru/ (дата доступа: 23.09.2022)

13

Отчет «Начни иначе» 20182020. Анализ социального воздействия программы. Режим доступа: https://rosbankcares.ru/research

14

Social Entrepreneurship in Russia: Prospects for Development (2021). Analytical report on the findings of an expert survey. Moscow: ZIRCON, Social Business Group. Retrieved from: http://www.zircon.ru/upload/iblock/a9b/sotsialnoe-predprinimatelstvo-v-rossii-perspektivy-razvitiya.pdf (accessed: 23.09.2022) (In Russian).

15

TASS (2022) About 40 % of social entrepreneurs surveyed are busy looking for investment during the crisis. Retrieved from: https://tass.ru/ekonomika/14592497 (accessed: 23.09.2022) (In Russian).

Позитивные изменения. Том 2, № 3 (2022). Positive changes. Volume 2, Issue 3 (2022)
читать Позитивные изменения. Том 2, № 3 (2022). Positive changes. Volume 2, Issue 3 (2022)
Гладких Наталья Юрьевна
Журнал «Позитивные изменения» – профессиональное издание, в котором отражаются результаты новейших исследований в оценке социальноэкономического воздействия, импактэкономики, фундаментальных и прикладных исследований.Журнал, в первую очередь, имеет практическую направленность и публикует статьи веду

Ваша оценка очень важна

0
Шрифт
Фон

Помогите Вашим друзьям узнать о библиотеке